<\/p>\n
For example, previous research had shown that fast-growing \u201cpioneer trees,\u201d the first to thrive in the damaged land, are eventually overtaken by larger carbon-storing trees. Dent\u2019s research helped fill in gaps about the mechanics of how this happens\u2014or doesn\u2019t happen\u2014in individual cases. In the Gustavia<\/em>-dominated patch, for instance, stubborn grasses planted by cattle ranchers smothered most other trees before they could take root. These trees can hang around, crowding out the light, for 150 years, blocking the second wave of large-trunked trees.\u00a0<\/p>\n Dent found herself well placed for the massive influx of interest in reforestation that began in 2015. She\u2019d already become a principal investigator for 2ndFor, an international research network aiming to learn how best to manage secondary forests. Using data gathered from the Barro Colorado plots, the team authored a 2016 paper in Nature <\/em>showing that a hectare of naturally regenerated secondary forest can capture 11 times as much carbon each year as an old-growth one, with young trees absorbing it quickly as they compete to grow toward the sun.\u00a0<\/p>\n Then, in a 2022 study published by the Royal Society, Dent and colleagues showed that locations such as Barro Colorado are among the best-case scenarios for what can be achieved without planting a single seed. Clearings are often surrounded by lush environments filled with birds, bats, and other animals, all of which help tree cover regain old-growth levels of richness and abundance within a few decades. Using data from Panama and Brazil, Dent published a follow-up in 2024 showing that plots with as little as 35% of tree cover can regenerate as forest.\u00a0<\/p>\n \u201cHaving these long-term mapped forest plots is really valuable,\u201d says Liza Comita, a professor of tropical forest ecology at Yale University, who is collaborating with Dent on projects that translate her findings into action. \u201cIt provides this really nice research infrastructure where you can build projects on top of that.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n In Panama, Dent works with nonprofits and carbon-crediting schemes to fast-track recovery. They\u2019ve mapped corridors to reconnect forest fragments and made plans to reintroduce animals in \u201csilent forests\u201d that have lost much of their wildlife. They\u2019re also working to replant tree species that can accelerate growth\u2014what Comita calls assisted natural regeneration. Leaving plots alone may seem like the simpler option, but it can\u2019t be done everywhere, says Dent. Many sites are too degraded.\u00a0<\/p>\n Clearings are often surrounded by lush environments filled with birds, bats, and other animals, all of which helps tree cover regain old-growth \u00adlevels of richness.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n The two are working with the London-based carbon-crediting startup Ponterra to develop solutions for a region of southern Panama where remnant forests line the edges of abandoned ranches. Such sites almost always need some intervention, Comita explains. Many demand hands-on actions, such as enrichment planting.\u00a0<\/p>\n Today, the questions projects like Ponterra are asking are closer to her own research, says Dent. For instance, they want to understand if solitary standing trees, often left by ranchers to shade cows, help sites regenerate faster. Those insights can help Ponterra sell high-quality credits and avoid the embarrassing pitfalls that can lead fresh plantations to literally go up in smoke. While credits can be bought for as little as $5 per metric ton, corporate giants such as Microsoft\u2014one of Ponterra\u2019s clients\u2014have paid more than 10 times as much for high-quality removal.<\/p>\n There are plenty of places where a level of natural regeneration can work well. So far, millions of hectares of rainforest are naturally regenerating in Brazil, according to the Brazilian Restoration and Reforestation Observatory. Still, Dent is mystified as to why the people in charge of large-scale projects continue to think the best solution is the one that imposes humans\u2019 will on the landscape.\u00a0<\/p>\n The conversation may be shifting. As droughts hit Latin America, policymakers and carbon creditors might be forced to face the shortcomings of cookie-cutter plantations. \u201cYou have much reduced resilience in the system when it comes to extreme events like droughts or floods or extreme heat or pathogens,\u201d Dent says. The coming year\u2019s \u201cmega El Ni\u00f1o\u201d could be a moment of reckoning, she says: \u201cI think there\u2019s an increasing recognition that we can\u2019t just plant trees. We have to rebuild a system.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n Matthew Ponsford is a freelance reporter based in London.<\/em>To plant or not to plant<\/h3>\n
\n